Built your app with Claude Code? We'll make it safe to keep running

Your app runs part of the business, and you’re nervous to touch it

You described what you needed, and Claude Code built it, maybe a client portal, a booking tool, or the system that tracks your orders. It worked, so you launched it, and now customers or staff use it every day. But each new change feels risky, something broke last week and took an evening to fix, and you’ve started to wonder who else can see the data in it.

Why Claude Code on its own doesn’t finish the job

Claude Code is a capable builder. It can read your whole project, run commands, and make changes across many files at once. When you ask for tests, security checks, or backups, it can write them well.

The gap is that nobody asked. When you’re building fast, you ask for features, and the protective work gets skipped. Claude Code also follows whatever rules your project gives it. With no CLAUDE.md file, or a thin one, each session starts without knowing how your app is meant to fit together, and small mismatches build up.

How we fix it

We start with a plain review. We read your project and list what’s solid, what’s risky, and what to fix first, written so you can follow it without being a developer.

Customer data and security come first. We look for keys and passwords in the code, databases open to the internet, and pages that skip the log-in check, and we close them. Then we add tests for the steps your business can’t do without, like sign-up, payments, and bookings.

Next, we set up a way back, with version control for the code and backups for the data. Finally, we write a proper CLAUDE.md for your project. It tells Claude Code how your app is laid out, which tests to run before calling a change done, and what it must never change without asking. From then on, you keep building, and the guard rails catch most mistakes before your customers do.

When fixing a Claude Code app is the right call, and when it isn’t

It’s the right call when the app does real work for your business and people rely on it. Targeted fixes and good project rules usually get it to a safe place.

If the app was an experiment nobody depends on, a full review may not be worth it. And tests and rules lower the risk without removing it. A person still needs to look at changes that touch payments or customer data before they go live.

Where to go next

See the wider fixing AI-built apps service, or read about Claude Code. If you built with Cursor, see fixing AI-built apps made in Cursor. For new builds, see apps and websites. See how we work with coaching and online education and hospitality and events. When you’re ready, get your AI Starter Plan.